Right-reading (adj): Having the proper orientation (used in printing)

Today is Saturday, July 4, 2009 4:53 pm (U.S. central time).

 

“There are books of which the backs and covers are by far the best parts.”
-- Charles Dickens

Topics


On this date on this blog

Tom Christensen
("xensen") . tom [at] rightreading.com
 

Subscribe

rss feed button

Search This Blog



12 Recent Posts

Most posts appear early weekday mornings.


 

Some Popular Pages

1 How to Get a Book Published
2 Persian Ceramics
3 Chinese Jade
4 Creative barcodes from Japan
5 Taoism and the Arts of China
6 The digital divide
7 New graphic design 8 Gutenberg and Asia
9 The Yi jing
10 Glossary of Book Publishing Terms
11 Books for Writers
12 Famous Last Words
13 On Julio Cortazar
14 On Lewis Caroll's Sylvie and Bruno
15 Daybook: September
16 The Making of Masters of Bamboo




Some popular blog posts, 2006-2008

Garamond Premier Pro

garamond premier pro
Working with Garamond Premier Pro for my book on Persian ceramics, I have been impressed by the range of sizes and weights the typeface includes. There are regular, medium, semibold, and bold weights for each of the sizes. In addition, the display size offers an extra-light weight in both regular and italic.

Different fonts are provided for four type sizes: caption, regular, subhead, and display. The caption fonts, for example, have large x-heights and heavier strokes in order to hold up at small sizes. The display fonts have elegantly modest x-heights and light stroke weights suitable for presentation at large sizes. The header for the image above is the medium display weight (to balance some of the dark fonts,including the caption fonts, which would not ordinarily be used at this large a size. The fonts also include a full range of diacritics and foreign-language characters.

Garamond Premier Pro was designed by Robert Slimbach on the model of the roman types of Claude Garamond and the italic types of Robert Granjon; it represent a reworking and expansion of the earlier Garamond Pro. It is available in OpenType from Adobe.

I sought to maintain the fidelity of the metal type as revealed in the specimen material—rather than taking a more subjective approach, such as attempting to reproduce artifacts of letterpress printing, or at the other extreme, modernizing form through heavy-handed stylization or drastic structural modification. I feel that by overtly imitating the appearance of an outdated technology, a digital type can appear antique, or even quaint, while excessive stylization can diminish the organic properties inherent in a hand-cut type. With Garamond Premier, I followed the details of line and form displayed in the original metal type as much as possible in order to reveal the ideal that I felt Garamond and Granjon were trying to achieve in their work. By preserving subtleties of shape, a level of fidelity is maintained that would normally be clouded by the noise-generating effects of letterpress printing on handmade papers. Throughout the design process, I repeatedly returned to the original proofs to ensure I was preserving details I felt were essential to the design. At the same time, I often felt it necessary to carefully adjust shapes and parameters in order to harmonize the varied work of these two individual designers within this single type family.
– Robert Slimbach

.

Most posts on typography

.

Print, e-mail, bookmark, share
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Comments

Comment from Tony Farmar
Time: January 30, 2009, 9:10 am

To my eye the appearing size of the Italic in Garamond Premier Pro is large than the associated Roman — and this, being unexpected even if it was the effect Granjon sought, is distracting in, for instance a contents page that uses both — any comments?

Comment from xensen
Time: February 1, 2009, 5:51 pm

Thanks for this observation, Tony. I can’t say that I have noticed it. Below I’ve tried to superimpose Garamond Premier Pro Italic over Garamond Premier Pro Regular. It’s not evident to me that there is a disparity, although admittedly this technique is a little imprecise.

I wonder if you are seeing a difference both on screen and in print. I could imagine a problem with screen fonts not matching print fonts, especially if you have other versions of Garamond.