Right-reading (adj): Having the proper orientation (used in printing)

Today is Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:05 pm (U.S. central time).

“Having books published is very destructive to writing.”
-- Ernest Hemingway

Topics


 

On this date on this blog

Some Recent Comments

  • JD: as I said- the eyes have it
  • xensen: As noted in an update to the post above, in response to Jim Hale-Sanders’s arguments in favor of the Sanders...
  • JD: The eyes in all four portraits are consistent. Perhaps they are all correct. Different painters have different...
Tom Christensen
("xensen") . tom [at] rightreading.com
 

Subscribe

rss feed button

Search This Blog



12 Recent Posts

Most posts appear early weekday mornings.


 

Some Popular Pages

1 How to Get a Book Published
2 Persian Ceramics
3 Chinese Jade
4 Creative barcodes from Japan
5 Taoism and the Arts of China
6 The digital divide
7 New graphic design 8 Gutenberg and Asia
9 The Yi jing
10 Glossary of Book Publishing Terms
11 Books for Writers
12 Famous Last Words
13 On Julio Cortazar
14 On Lewis Caroll's Sylvie and Bruno
15 Daybook: September
16 The Making of Masters of Bamboo




Some popular blog posts, 2006-2008

Knopf’s rejections

It might be worth considering what you want archived. From Knopf’s archives at the University of Texas come the following judgments:

  • Jorge Luis Borges: “Utterly untranslatable”
  • Isaac Bashevis Singer: “It’s Poland and the rich Jews again”
  • Anaïs Nin: “There is no commercial advantage in acquiring her, and, in my opinion, no artistic”
  • Sylvia Plath: “There certainly isn’t enough genuine talent for us to take notice”
  • Jack Kerouac: “His frenetic and scrambling prose perfectly express the feverish travels of the Beat Generation. But is that enough? I don’t think so”
  • Vladimir Nabokov (Lolita): “Too racy”
  • James Baldwin (Giovanni’s Room): “Hopelessly bad”

This was published in a NYT article, but I got it from Three Percent.

Read more about rejection.

(BTW, on the subject of rejection, Madeleine L’Engle’s recent obituaries contained the information that her A Wrinkle in Time was rejected by 26 publishers.)

Print, e-mail, bookmark, share
  • Print
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Comments

Comment from Nancy
Time: September 20, 2007, 11:18 am

Oh My God. If I were the archivist at Knopf, I would have made sure these sorts of notes never made it into a permanent file. I know that “us” artists are supposed to take rejection in stride but I wonder what those editors would have felt like if somebody had treated them in such a fashion. They might have been at least a bit more civil, if not more astute.

Comment from xensen
Time: September 20, 2007, 5:22 pm

I don’t know that this is what they said to the authors. I think it’s their internal memoranda. But it’s interesting to see their thinking, so I’m glad they archived it, even if it doesn’t show them in the most favorable light.

Comment from Robert
Time: September 21, 2007, 10:02 am

Always a comforting read. :)

Pingback from blog.rightreading.com » Book sales, book publishing economics, and print on demand
Time: September 24, 2007, 5:05 am

[...] Knopf’s rejections [...]

Write a comment