Right-reading (adj): Having the proper orientation (used in printing)

Today is Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:00 am (U.S. central time).

“The multitude of books is making us ignorant.”
-- Voltaire

Topics


Tom Christensen
("xensen") . tom [at] rightreading.com
 

Subscribe (RSS)

rss feed button





Subscribe to my e-mail newsletter


Search This Blog



12 Recent Posts

Most posts appear early weekday mornings.


 

Some Popular Pages

1 How to Get a Book Published
2 Persian Ceramics
3 Chinese Jade
4 Creative barcodes from Japan
5 Taoism and the Arts of China
6 The digital divide
7 New graphic design 8 Gutenberg and Asia
9 The Yi jing
10 Glossary of Book Publishing Terms
11 Books for Writers
12 Famous Last Words
13 On Julio Cortazar
14 On Lewis Caroll's Sylvie and Bruno
15 Daybook: September
16 The Making of Masters of Bamboo


Some popular blog posts, 2006-2008

Take the “Philosophical Health Check”

The philosophical health check purports to determine whether you hold contradictory beliefs. Apparently the premise is that this is a bad thing.

But what about Whitman? “Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)” And don’t even get me started on Breton or Artaud.

And how does one determine whether to agree or disagree with statements like “It is not always right to judge individuals solely on their merits”? What does it mean to “judge individuals” in the first place? I mean, Adonal Foyle is not the best center in the NBA, but he does write some, okay some pretty indifferent poetry.

My tention quotient was 27%. They call that “low,” but the average score to date is 28%. So I guess low is average, which would make medium high, and . . . oh, suddenly I’m starting to feel sort of philosophically tense . . .

Comments

Comment from Conrad
Time: November 5, 2006, 5:47 pm

Well, I got 0%. I guess I’m just very consistent!

Terrible test, though–it really couldn’t have been any other way.

Write a comment