Right Reading

concept to publication

Media Predict’s Project Publish

sorry darwinHere’s a weird mash-up of book marketing, acquisitions, and social media. A group called Media Predict is soliciting book proposals from authors and agents (I’m not sure what sort of agent would participate in this). The proposals are posted on the site. “Traders” from the general public are given $5000 in fantasy money to invest in the books based on the posted summaries.

The books that do best in the competition will be short-listed for review by a group of editors for the grand prize, which includes publication of Simon and Schuster’s Touchstone Books, “so long as the completed manuscript satisfies Touchstone’s publishing criteria.”

It seems like an awfully difficult way to get a book published. If the project is successful, it will presumably amount to further a further reduction in the influence of editors, in favor of the collective wisdom that has produced such wonderful performers via American Idol — although clearly Touchstone Books wanted to retain ultimate editorial control despite whatever incentive Media Predict obtained their participation with.

“Media Predict and Project Publish is an intriguing new way to evaluate content for publication,” said Mark Gompertz, Executive Vice President and Publisher of Touchstone Fireside. “It is the ultimate pre-publication, market-based focus group. I look forward to following the market closely once trading gets underway and using their lead to invest in a project for publication by Touchstone.”

“If they say we find it really persuasive that everyone bet on book A, they’re just looking at a book that everyone bet that everyone else bet that everyone else thinks is the best book,” according to Justin Wolfers, an assistant professor of business and public policy at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, as quoted in the New York Times. “So you don’t end up with the wisdom of crowds, but the infinite reflection of crowds looking at crowds.”

New York Times: Publisher to Let the Public Have a Vote on Book Projects

The cartoon image is from Resurgence: “Democratising Science”

Previous

So What

Next

Book Reviews in Blogs and Newspapers

1 Comment

  1. Kelly

    It really does seem like S&S are really concerned the stock traders will pick a dud. I’m in this contest and as of now and will probably be voted off the island soon. So far I’ve gotten at least one flamer ranting about how much my proposal sucked, although I wouldn’t file his comments under insightful literary analysis. And that was what I was hoping for, a chance to gauge what people thought of my book.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Some rights reserved 2018 Right Reading. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution, noncommercial, no derivs: 3.0) License (US), although some of the work this blog incorporates may be separately licensed. Text and images by Thomas Christensen unless otherwise noted. For print permissions or other inquiries please request via rightreading.com/contact.htm.