Right Reading

concept to publication

Who is Eric Keroack?

I’m learning lots of new names lately. I just mastered Ted Leonsis, and now the Bush badministration is pushing Eric Keroack at us.

No dharma bum, Keroack is a gynecologist who has been appointed head of the federal Office of Population Affairs. Even this office is new to me, but it has a budget of $283 million. What does it do with all that money? Well, it “oversees federally funded teen pregnancy, family planning and abstinence programs.”

So what’s the problem? It seems this guy is the head of a Christian group called A Woman’s Concern, and he “opposes premarital sex, contraception and abortion.” So we have a guy in charge, bascially, of family planning who doesn’t believe in family planning, in any sense that most people think of it.

“The appointment of anti-birth control, anti-sex education advocate Dr. Eric Keroack to oversee the nation’s family planning program is striking proof that the Bush administration remains dramatically out of step with the nation’s priorities,” Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement.

The quotes are from a CNN article on this appointment.

Previous

Ecobungling, 19th century style

Next

Tony Blair calls Iraq a “disaster”

3 Comments

  1. P. Z. Myers is reporting that Keroack has some wacky ideas about science too.

  2. You mean “sex causes people to go through oxytocin withdrawal which in turn prevents people from bonding in relationships”?

    If only I had got this information sooner! Now I’ll never love again!
    Well, I’ll just have to make do as best I can. Looks like there’s nothing left for me but sex, sex, sex at this point.

  3. cth

    […] Who is Eric Keroack? […]

    Someone who in my experience must have been devoid of oxytocin before he ever got married. I say that because his ability to “bond” was nil, nor was he even kind about his lack of ability to “bond”. He also could not use the “excuse” that he engaged in immoral premarital sexual activity as the reason for this lack of oxytocin, because that did not occur.

Comments are closed.

Some rights reserved 2019 Right Reading. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution, noncommercial, no derivs: 3.0) License (US), although some of the work this blog incorporates may be separately licensed. Text and images by Thomas Christensen unless otherwise noted. For print permissions or other inquiries please request via rightreading.com/contact.htm.