Archive for 'editing'
Two more tough words to spell
I wrote yesterday about a word that was misspelled by thirteen out of fourteen experienced editors. Here are two words from the test that were each missed by ten of the editors. The second one is a little surprising; at least, I consider it a basic word that any editor should know.
Pick the spelling preferred [...]
Posted: July 17th, 2008 under editing.
Comments: 2
A hard word to spell
It means “to dry; to preserve by drying.”
I’m hiring a temporary replacement editor for a colleague who will be out several months on a medical leave. I got a lot of very qualified applicants. To whittle them down I produced a test of 85 objective questions. I tested the top 14 candidates, all with sterling [...]
Posted: July 16th, 2008 under editing.
Comments: 2
Poor, poorer, porous
Some pretty porous copy on this text panel about porous paving at the National Botanical Gardens near the capitol building in Washington, DC. (Official, nonpartisan, federal government-approved typos.)
.
Conceivably Related PostsSave Desuetude …The Save Desuetude movement starts here.
How could the sentence “We’d be no poorer if desuetude, …Scene of the crime
Victim and perp: broken ankle and [...]
Posted: July 9th, 2008 under editing.
Comments: none
Why are book editors so gullible?
Fake memoirs are in the news again, with the usual hand wringing. No need to go into the details, which have been thoroughly reported. Instead, let’s think about what might make book editors so gullible.
Book editors are a peculiar mixture of optimism and cynicism. They begin as idealistic literature enthusiasts — they probably start with [...]
Posted: March 6th, 2008 under books, editing.
Comments: none
Wordsmithing
WORDSMITHING: The process of going through a document and making sure the best possible word is used in all circumstances. — ww.lewiswritingservices.com/glossary.htm
If there is one word I would like to ban permanently it’s wordsmithing. In my day job there is someone who likes to say “Give it to Tom for wordsmithing.” The implication, to [...]
Posted: March 4th, 2008 under editing, language.
Comments: 2
Semi-buzz
Recently there has been an uptick in talk about semicolons. Witness:
Hooray for the ;
I say! A subterranean semicolon!
FANBOYS and the Semicolon
Colbert on punctuation
How to Use Punctuation Correctly
Punctuation lives
The Elements of Spam
Semicolonoscopy
What does this signify? I’m not sure. Could it be another sign of the trend to the literate class becoming a cultural elite, eager to [...]
Posted: February 20th, 2008 under editing, writing.
Comments: 3
Refute vs. rebut
When it comes to copy editing, I’m not particularly strict — let the author have some personal style. We all use words a little differently.
But one thing that has been annoying me lately is what I regard as the misuse of the word refute. Newspaper journalists and others consistently use refute when they mean rebut. [...]
Posted: February 14th, 2008 under editing.
Comments: none
The need for editorial direction
Web 2.0 experiments with open content are showing the value of moderated forums. Democracy is great, but chaos isn’t necessarily so hot.
Once upon a time tech types used to track stories on Digg.com. When a post got promoted to Digg’s front page it would bring your site a huge amount of traffic. The web [...]
Posted: January 30th, 2008 under Uncategorized, editing, webwork.
Comments: none
Disappearing hyphens?
Since a big deal is being made about supposedly disappearing hyphens, let’s apply a little perspective to the discussion.
The first thing to realize is that the furor is the result of a promotional campaign for a new edition of the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary; the sixth edition has omitted 16,000 hyphens that were included in [...]
Posted: October 1st, 2007 under editing, language.
Comments: 4
Advice from an editor
Conceivably Related PostsHow does one become a book designer?Several answers are offered in comments to a post on this topic at the Book Design Review. Many peop…Publishing role visualizationDon’t waste time taking those long multiple-choice tests where half the answers seem equally right b…Tips for writers who blogThe resourceful C.M. Mayo — a Flannery O’Connor [...]
Posted: September 26th, 2007 under editing.
Comments: 1
Do we really need copy editors?
By MARK SHERMAN | Associated Press Writer: “[Supreme Court chief justice] Roberts walked out the hospital’s ambulance door wearing a blue sport coast, a blue shirt with no tie and slacks”
Conceivably Related PostsPoor, poorer, porous
Some pretty porous copy on this text panel about porous paving at the National Botanical Gardens…Two more tough words to spellI [...]
Posted: August 2nd, 2007 under editing, newspapers.
Comments: none
The impotence of proofreading
via India Ink
Conceivably Related PostsNew World / New WordsAcouple of days ago I completed proofreading first pages of New World / New Words: Recent Writing fr…Book sales, book publishing economics, and print on demand
If you are quixotic enough to wish to engage in literary book publishing, you might want to take…
Posted: July 23rd, 2007 under editing, film-video.
Comments: none
Seen on eBay
It must be the desk that ups the price.
This “writhing desk” recalls Harry Potter, or maybe Lewis Carroll:”The regular course was Reeling and Writhing, of course, to begin with; and then the different branches of Arithmetic — Ambition, Distraction, Uglification, and Derision.”
Conceivably Related PostsNo related posts
Posted: April 27th, 2007 under editing, offbeat.
Comments: none
Editing Reality
No, despite the title this is not another post about the Bush administration. It’s a link to an interesting video demonstrating how editing can manipulate viewers’ impressions of reality — the basis of “reality” television shows.
Via Swiss Miss via Random Culture
Conceivably Related PostsCopyediting ShakespeareFor an anthology I’ve been working on the publisher chose to copyedit [...]
Posted: April 8th, 2007 under editing.
Comments: 1
Copyediting Shakespeare
For an anthology I’ve been working on the publisher chose to copyedit some classic texts. It made me wonder how they would handle Shakespeare.
Conceivably Related PostsExtended Live Archives | One year agoELA seems to be a pretty good WordPress plugin. I’ve never had an archives link on my blogs, because…The most pompous translator of our [...]
Posted: October 20th, 2006 under editing, literature, publishing.
Comments: 7
“Are Editors Moribund?”
BBC NEWS | The Editors |
That’s the question the BBC is asking (link above). “What is there left when voices rise in debate without chairman or standing orders? You have babble, not Google,” they argue (an argument that is itself, of course, an editorial decision.) I don’t much care for the “chairman” analogy — I’m [...]
Posted: August 22nd, 2006 under alternative, editing.
Comments: 3

