Right-reading (adj): Having the proper orientation (used in printing)

Today is Wednesday, March 17, 2010 6:57 am (U.S. central time).

Topics


 

On this date on this blog

Some Recent Comments

  • jameshigham: I’m not crazy about the aqua tones either – it’s all in the eye of the beholder,...
  • Sarah Newman: What did Shakespeare look like – well l know what l would like him to look like, I’m all...
  • Nancy: What an illuminating e-mail! Thanks to the two of you – Tom for posting such a thought provoking post...
Tom Christensen
("xensen") . tom [at] rightreading.com
 

Subscribe

rss feed button

Search This Blog



12 Recent Posts

Most posts appear early weekday mornings.


 

Some Popular Pages

1 How to Get a Book Published
2 Persian Ceramics
3 Chinese Jade
4 Creative barcodes from Japan
5 Taoism and the Arts of China
6 The digital divide
7 New graphic design 8 Gutenberg and Asia
9 The Yi jing
10 Glossary of Book Publishing Terms
11 Books for Writers
12 Famous Last Words
13 On Julio Cortazar
14 On Lewis Caroll's Sylvie and Bruno
15 Daybook: September
16 The Making of Masters of Bamboo




Some popular blog posts, 2006-2008

Writers reading Right Reading

links to tom's glossary of publishing termsThe image at right is a selection from my inlinks tag in Google Reader. It shows websites that have been linking to mine (these are all via Google Blog Search). This is less than a single day’s sample. As you can see, all of a sudden many people are posting links on their blogs to my glossary of book publishing terms.

I’m sure the number of links is not staggering compared to pages that go viral on places like Digg. Still, the glossary has gotten about 5,000 views over the past five days.

Laura Resnick was thoughful enough to send me an e-mail explaining, “In case no one has already told you, a link to your delightful Publishing Glossary has lately been passed around various private e-lists of professional writers, and we’re enjoying the glossary very much! Thanks for a good laugh.”

Thanks to the writers for sharing the link to my site rather than just ripping off the content. I guess writers are a good group to engage if you’re looking for links, since these days they all have blogs and they are motivated to, well, write. (I’d also guess from this list that writers will always need proofreaders.) The ones who linked back to me seemed a genial and generous lot.

This page first went up back in 2006. It’s gotten a bunch of links over the years, but never such a big flood all at once as this. I’ve made no effort at link-building, so this is what a “natural” wave of links looks like. How would Google distinguish this natural wave of links from the kinds of “artificial” link-building campaigns that they say they discount in their search result rankings?

Print, e-mail, bookmark, share
  • Print
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Write a comment