<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python poetry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/09/18/python-poetry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/09/18/python-poetry/</link>
	<description>concept to publication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/09/18/python-poetry/comment-page-1/#comment-57757</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightreading.com/blog/?p=1012#comment-57757</guid>
		<description>I find it ... gratifyingly bizarre. Like contemporary poets, the Pythons were experimenting, frequently failing, sometimes coming out with moments of genius. This clip seems to show that aspect of their work in an unvarnished way, somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it &#8230; gratifyingly bizarre. Like contemporary poets, the Pythons were experimenting, frequently failing, sometimes coming out with moments of genius. This clip seems to show that aspect of their work in an unvarnished way, somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
