Right-reading (adj): Having the proper orientation (used in printing)

Today is Friday, March 12, 2010 8:56 pm (U.S. central time).

Topics


 

On this date on this blog

Some Recent Comments

  • Nancy: What an illuminating e-mail! Thanks to the two of you – Tom for posting such a thought provoking post...
  • xensen: I received the following comment by e-mail from Jim Hale-Sanders. When I get a moment I will see if I can add...
  • xensen: James, thanks for introducing the Sanders portrait. You can put me down as a skeptic on this one, because the...
Tom Christensen
("xensen") . tom [at] rightreading.com
 

Subscribe

rss feed button

Search This Blog



12 Recent Posts

Most posts appear early weekday mornings.


 

Some Popular Pages

1 How to Get a Book Published
2 Persian Ceramics
3 Chinese Jade
4 Creative barcodes from Japan
5 Taoism and the Arts of China
6 The digital divide
7 New graphic design 8 Gutenberg and Asia
9 The Yi jing
10 Glossary of Book Publishing Terms
11 Books for Writers
12 Famous Last Words
13 On Julio Cortazar
14 On Lewis Caroll's Sylvie and Bruno
15 Daybook: September
16 The Making of Masters of Bamboo




Some popular blog posts, 2006-2008

Friday Fireworks

fireworks in san francisco

Linking fourth . . .

“Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” — Benjamin Franklin

.

photo from tinou bao’s photostream

.

Print, e-mail, bookmark, share
  • Print
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Comments

Comment from Tom Masters
Time: July 4, 2008, 12:01 pm

Hi Tom -
I don’t think the blook network forces publishers to “descend to the lowest common denominator.” It still gives them the opportunity to select from writers who have demonstrated they something people want to read. One of the tragedies of publishing today is the millions of copies of books that get pulped because a publisher’s judgment went awry.
Regards.
- Tom

Comment from xensen
Time: July 5, 2008, 5:56 am

Thanks, Tom. I was probably too harsh.

Write a comment