Comments on: Garamond Premier Pro http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/05/08/garamond-premier-pro/ concept to publication Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:59:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: xensen http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/05/08/garamond-premier-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-68019 xensen Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:51:43 +0000 http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/05/08/garamond-premier-pro/#comment-68019 Thanks for this observation, Tony. I can't say that I have noticed it. Below I've tried to superimpose Garamond Premier Pro Italic over Garamond Premier Pro Regular. It's not evident to me that there is a disparity, although admittedly this technique is a little imprecise. I wonder if you are seeing a difference both on screen and in print. I could imagine a problem with screen fonts not matching print fonts, especially if you have other versions of Garamond. <img src="http://www.rightreading.com/blog-images-09/garamond-premier-pro.jpg"> Thanks for this observation, Tony. I can’t say that I have noticed it. Below I’ve tried to superimpose Garamond Premier Pro Italic over Garamond Premier Pro Regular. It’s not evident to me that there is a disparity, although admittedly this technique is a little imprecise.

I wonder if you are seeing a difference both on screen and in print. I could imagine a problem with screen fonts not matching print fonts, especially if you have other versions of Garamond.

]]> By: Tony Farmar http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/05/08/garamond-premier-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-67873 Tony Farmar Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:10:30 +0000 http://www.rightreading.com/blog/2008/05/08/garamond-premier-pro/#comment-67873 To my eye the appearing size of the Italic in Garamond Premier Pro is large than the associated Roman -- and this, being unexpected even if it was the effect Granjon sought, is distracting in, for instance a contents page that uses both -- any comments? To my eye the appearing size of the Italic in Garamond Premier Pro is large than the associated Roman — and this, being unexpected even if it was the effect Granjon sought, is distracting in, for instance a contents page that uses both — any comments?

]]>