Right-reading (adj): Having the proper orientation (used in printing)

Today is Monday, March 15, 2010 4:12 am (U.S. central time).

“People who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like.”
-- Abraham Lincoln

Topics


 

On this date on this blog

Some Recent Comments

  • Nancy: What an illuminating e-mail! Thanks to the two of you – Tom for posting such a thought provoking post...
  • xensen: I received the following comment by e-mail from Jim Hale-Sanders. When I get a moment I will see if I can add...
  • xensen: James, thanks for introducing the Sanders portrait. You can put me down as a skeptic on this one, because the...
Tom Christensen
("xensen") . tom [at] rightreading.com
 

Subscribe

rss feed button

Search This Blog



12 Recent Posts

Most posts appear early weekday mornings.


 

Some Popular Pages

1 How to Get a Book Published
2 Persian Ceramics
3 Chinese Jade
4 Creative barcodes from Japan
5 Taoism and the Arts of China
6 The digital divide
7 New graphic design 8 Gutenberg and Asia
9 The Yi jing
10 Glossary of Book Publishing Terms
11 Books for Writers
12 Famous Last Words
13 On Julio Cortazar
14 On Lewis Caroll's Sylvie and Bruno
15 Daybook: September
16 The Making of Masters of Bamboo




Some popular blog posts, 2006-2008

Typographia

19th-century printing press

Typographia: An Historical Sketch of the Origin and Progress of the Art of Printing was published in 1825, “Printed for Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.” The author was Thomas Curson Hansard. The book is now available as a Google scan. Its musty pages contain some information that has been largely forgotten. Here’s a passage offering some insight into the life and character of the typographer William Caslon.

character of william caslon

As you can see, like many nineteenth-century books, this one, despite its topic, is not a good example of the typographic arts.

Is it too technologically difficult or time-consuming for the texts of these public domain books to be rendered by Google as texts rather than graphics? In this respect Project Gutenberg is far superior.

Print, e-mail, bookmark, share
  • Print
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Comments

Comment from Nancy
Time: March 19, 2008, 8:52 am

Let me second that motion. Google scanned books are horrible. The interface is clunky and the type choices are medieval. Now, if they are concerned about copyright, that’s one issue but if the book is old and out of print, why not provide a much more readable copy? Nobody’s going to buy it anyway.
Although I guess there are a lot of other issues here including copyright.

Write a comment