concept to publication

Month: August 2006

Authorship and the Web

On a worldwide web where anybody can post anything any time (unless they live in a place like China, but that’s a subject for another post), how can we identify original content? How much does proper attribution matter?

There’s a whole parasitic industry of taking other people’s content and manipulating it to draw hits and bring in income from advertising. (The essence of this kind of work is not high percentage yield but just sheer volume, so they are avaricious for content.) For example, a few weeks ago someone stole my article on if historical figures had been webmasters and posted it as if it were their own work, without any attribution or acknowledgment of my authorship. In the on-line world such copying has become so common as to seem trivial. Even entire sites may be duplicated.

Consider a couple of examples from just the past few days. First, at SEOmoz a scraper included in a post making fun of her an e-mail from a woman who felt she had been wronged. The e-mail was only removed on advice of counsel. Following up on this, Graywolf made a couple of posts on his popular SEO blog that were designed to manipulate search engine results to punish the woman (SEOEgghead spoke up on her behalf).

Did the woman have a legitimate complaint? Does she have a right to “own” search results on her name and business, or are they fair game for anyone to use as they wish?

In another current case a columnist for the Daily Telegraph posted a column that was pulled word for word from a blogger’s entry. (No explanation yet from the paper or the columnist.)

According to the Berne convention, “Independently of the author’s economic rights, and even after the transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work.”

Have such rights become merely theoretical? Do they continue to have meaning in a great collective enterprise like the web? Is it inevitable that technology tends to remove content from individual control? I’d love to know your thoughts.

“Are Editors Moribund?”

BBC NEWS | The Editors |

That’s the question the BBC is asking (link above). “What is there left when voices rise in debate without chairman or standing orders? You have babble, not Google,” they argue (an argument that is itself, of course, an editorial decision.) I don’t much care for the “chairman” analogy — I’m too much of an anarchist for that protofascist yearning for parental discipline — but it seems to me that the more the soup is stirred the higher the premium on a discriminating palate. As long as that palate can be recognized or appreciated.

Social bookmarking sites like Digg and replace the editorial function with a kind of democratic free-for-all, largely unrestrained by any checks and balances. Which does present opportunities. But recent studies have shown that a small number of people are able to control most of the high-ranking articles on such sites through established networks.

Which system is better for protecting minority and alternative views? Are there other options? How can alternative viewpoints make themselves heard, when the whole world is tuned in to American Idol?

Blog anthem

Listen to the blog starters’ anthem here.

Comments on the Yi jing

Since I’ve had a few visitors to my new rendering of the Yi jing recently I thought thought I’d make a post here in case anyone wants to comment.

New Blog Launch

I’m moving the main rightreading blog over here, where it will be hosted as a subdomain of other words, as You can pick up the feed at feedburner.

I’ll probably keep alive the old blogger blog (I also have a LiveJournal blog, but that’s mainly for family). I hope to have greater control and flexibility by hosting the blog myself (with WordPress). Mainly it just seems neater to have the blog reside here rather than offsite.

Let me hear your suggestions about modifying the design or adding features. Any thoughts on defining a different focus for the two blogs?

Some rights reserved 2021 Right Reading. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution, noncommercial, no derivs: 3.0) License (US), although some of the work this blog incorporates may be separately licensed. Text and images by Thomas Christensen unless otherwise noted. For print permissions or other inquiries please request via