Right Reading

concept to publication

1616: The World in Motion accepted for publication


avercamp: colf

Colf Players on the Ice, ca. 1620­–1625, by Hendrick Avercamp. Edmund and Sally Speelman Collection.

Now that I have a preliminary commitment from a publisher I feel I can finally talk about my new book, tentatively planned for publication in fall-winter 2011 from Counterpoint Press. It’s basically a global history of the world in the year 1616.

Why 1616? In a way the year is more or less random, and looking intently at any one year would probably turn out to be interesting. But 1616, though in some ways more of an average year than an earthshaking one, falls right at the cusp when the world was teetering toward modernity. With a regular trade now established between Asia and the Americas via the Pacific the final piece in a true global economy was in place. Obviously I will have more to say on this topic.

The image above is by Hendrick Avercamp, a Dutch painter specializing in ice scenes. 1616 fell during the global cooling called the Little Ice Age. That cooling was a factor leading to the destabilization and fall of China’s Ming empire. I could go on …

Previous

Great opening paragraphs: The Confusions of Pleasure by Timothy Brook

Next

Pandora

2 Comments

  1. How exciting! Some of my favorite history books are those that take a year and follow the events of that year across the globe. One of the books that I liked is “1688, A Global History. ” There was another one, set in the First Century AD. So, you’ve got a great concept and knowing how meticulous you are, I am sure that the book will be a winner!

  2. You’re well read, Nancy. I’m glad you mentioned John Wills’s book, 1688, because it is the most comparable to mine. I say that not having read it (yet) — I remembered it a while after getting into my project, but I decided not to read it for fear it would influence me too much. I have read other writing by Wills, and I think he is quite good.

    When I sent my opening chapters to my publisher, I figured I’d better check it out so I could mention it as a comparable. I only looked at the TOC but judging from that it appears his organization is geographic. Mine is thematic, so I don’t think the books are too much alike.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Some rights reserved 2018 Right Reading. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons (attribution, noncommercial, no derivs: 3.0) License (US), although some of the work this blog incorporates may be separately licensed. Text and images by Thomas Christensen unless otherwise noted. For print permissions or other inquiries please request via rightreading.com/contact.htm.